Please forward to your lists.  (If you have anything you would like circulated in future reports please send details to me, preferably a short description plus URL)
 
Southall in Front of GMC
Hearings with David Southall in front of the General Medical Council Fitness to Practise Committee commence on Monday.   I have expressed a particular concern that the issue of historic research, particularly project E5 where the facts are accepted as in the Hull Report, is not being considered by the committee.  However, it will mean that some of the issues which have been concealed for decades will come to the fore.
 
Lawrence Alexander, one of the test subjects, has issued a statement.
http://johnhemming.blogspot.com/2006/11/times-articles-and-southall-victim.html
and a press release which is available on his web space
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=53964803
 
There have been two interesting articles in the times
one by John Batt
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-2436307,00.html
relating to MSbP and FII
one by Adrian Keane
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-2436306,00.html
about unreliable evidence.
 
A contrary argument for professional secrecy occurs here from Jonathan Gornall
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/333/7576/1024
I have asked him to explain why professionals should be allowed to give evidence in secret.
 
Metaphyseal Fractures
I have written to the College of Radiologists to ask for their formal evidenced position on Metaphyseal Fractures.
This paper
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12709748&dopt=Abstract
demonstrates that Metaphyseal Fractures in isolation do not prove Child Abuse.
 
RCPCH   
I have written to the RCPCH to ask for a meeting about research protocols.  No response has been received as yet (about 2 weeks).
 
Useful recent URLs (in previous reports)
The judgement of Justice Mumby relating to the Webster Family is an important judgement.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-2436245,00.html
 
Court of Appeal judgement relating to Roy Meadow. 
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1390.html
 
Tammy's story demonstrates the difficulty of Contested Adoptions forced through on the basis of flawed evidence, on the balance of probabilities in secret.  There is an effect both on the child, the birth parents and the adoptive parents.  I am calling for a hold on contested adoptions whilst the process is reviewed. 
http://www.fassit.co.uk/opening_up_family_courts.htm
 
EDMs when retabled will appear at.
http://edmi.parliament.uk 
 
The Family Proceedings (Amendment No 4) Rules 2005
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20051976.htm
 
Simon Clayton's hearing into secrecy
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=393926&in_page_id=1879
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,200-2246764,00.html
The reference is to Daily Mail and Times Online articles about Simon Clayton obtaining the right to talk publicly about his private law Family Court Case.  I don't have the original case materials to hand.  However, it gives a mechanism whereby people can obtain court orders to talk publicly about their cases.
http://www.simonclayton.org.uk/
 
Consultation on opening up proceedings in family courts
http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courttransparencey1106/cp1106.htm
This is an important consultation into a more widespread opening up of access to Family Court Cases.   The consultation remains open.  An area where concern remains is mechanisms to prevent continual perjury in Family Courts.
 
Children and Families Comprehensive Spending Review
The government is reviewing expenditure in each budget heading.  People may wish to argue that money spent in assisting families in looking after their children would be more cost effective than expensive residential and foster care.
 
Joint HM Treasury and Department for Education and Skills
Children and Young People's Review: terms of reference (DfES/HMT)
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3DE/13/cyp_statement050706.pdf